Monday, November 19, 2007

City Council Election Analysis (and partial recent gang activity summary) - DAILY SOUND November 20, 2007

What a week. We have had a small change to the city council and have been left to speculate – why didn’t Brian Barnwell do so well as an incumbent? After reading a week of media analysis and blog opinions, the turtles have decided that nobody gets it. All are scratching their heads, wondering how could this be? According to the Independent, the lesson Das Williams distilled from the election results is that candidates who worked hardest and walked precincts earliest did the best. In other words, Barnwell failed because he did not do this - he ran a “bad campaign”.

Nope, that’s not it. It is somewhat insulting to the voter’s intelligence to make the assertion that we are a group of suckers that vote not on performance, but rather on who has the best funding and who comes to shake our hand. It wasn’t that Barnwell performed so poorly in campaigning, it was that he performed poorly in office, in regard to the number one issue – public safety. Not just Barnwell, but the entire Council, Police Chief and Mayor. Nobody in leadership appears to be getting the loud and clear message we are trying to send that the City has a quickly escalating gang problem and people care about it!

Quite simply, the issue of public safety is becoming number one in the public eye. At least one challenger who made this his number one priority unseated an incumbent, with two other public-safety-oriented challengers not far behind. What really happened is that people are waking up to the ever-increasing threat imposed by decreasing public safety. The threat is not only to our personal welfare as we walk the city streets, but also to the welfare of the city’s economic vitality. The city’s vitality depends on its low crime image as a tourist and shopping destination and nice place to live and work.

The current council largely ignored the rapid increase in violent activity until it became too big and ugly to hide anymore. Of the three like-minded incumbents, at least one had to go, as a sacrifice to the public safety gods. Barnwell was the first to suffer because, of the three, he was the most middle-of-the-road (not as well supported by the progressive activists) and had the least hair, youth and campaign funding.

We prefer to look at the final tally this way: Incumbents 19579, Challengers 20703. Add it up yourself. In reality, there are more voters unhappy with the current council than the Williams/Schneider win would at first seem to indicate. For those who can’t figure it out, the shift in the council is a response to dissatisfaction with the City’s response to public safety issues. The current council members concerned about the next election should take note, because as Frank Hotchkiss points out – “In two more years, there are going to be five seats open”. Looking at the complete numbers, the undisputable fact is, this truly was an anti-incumbent election. Williams and Schneider’s success must be viewed in context with the current council’s imminent failure. As turtles we are elated, because we know that slow and steady wins the race.

Meanwhile, the ineffectiveness of the City’s weak response to gang problems continues to rear its ugly head. In the six short months since the “wakeup call” murders of Linares in March and Carachure in July, violence is increasing in frequency, ferocity and boldness. Current events continue to indicate that the target, - which should be currently active gang members – (as opposed to at-risk-youth) is being missed with no improvement in sight. Victims are no longer just rival gang members engaged in a brawl, but now are innocents in the community, taking walks or sitting in cars in their own neighborhoods. Gang member’s weapons of choice have escalated from small knives and baseball bats to machetes, large butcher knives and guns. In our back yard, we have murders by illegal nationals controlled by Mexican drug cartels that endanger our hiking trails. We have street gangs with the potential of being controlled by deadly powerful prison gangs, if they are not already. We have had meth-induced murder-for-hire schemes and murders.

Here is a summary of reported recent events, since the City “took action”:


November 19 (Today) - 23 students suspended for being involved in a gang fight at Dos Pueblos High School.

http://www.keyt.com/news/local/11628156.html

November 16, 2007 – Man assumed to be rival gang member attacked with butcher knife by Francisco Alcaraz 20, Enrique Moran 20, Jason Odale 21 and a 15 year old juvenile at 1:40 PM broad daylight at a USA gas station on Carrillo street.

November 13 – Two teens attacked and robbed while sitting in their car at Franklin Center by three gang members inflicting knife wounds.

November 13 - Five gang members – Emilio Mora 19, Jose Zavala 21, Roberto Amador 19, and two juvenile males breaking car windows with occupants inside and brandishing a large butcher knife.

November 10 – A 15 year old is left with gunshot wounds on the 2400 block of Alexander Street.

November 9 – A gang fight on Milpas after which four gang members are arrested for weapons violations – one for a parole violation.

November 8 – Gang fight at Foodland Market on San Andreas – two gang members arrested – one on a parole violation and one with an outstanding warrant.

October 28 – Three “people” with ski masks armed with machetes and bats victimize 16 year-old “boy”. Victim is struck in the head and suffered laceration to his neck in the 300 block of Ladero Street.

October 28 – A carload of “people” stab a 15 year old in the arm in the 600 block of Eucalyptus.

October 24 – Methamphetamine induced murder for hire scheme gone awry.

October 14 – A 28-year-old non-gang affiliate stabbed three times by gang members Wilfredo Medina 24, and Martin Mendez 24 (parole violator).

September 30 – A 50 year old man taking a walk near his house on Shoreline drive is assaulted and robbed at knifepoint by two gang members.

September 17 – Murder of 23 year old Adan Ruiz tied to a large illegal marijuana grow near Lompoc, which according to Sheriff Bill Brown is likely part of a large drug cartel operating out of Mexico.

Notice - these are only the incidents reported by the Daily Sound in the span of little more than the last two months. An examination of some of the local blogs indicates that many more incidents are occurring than are finding their way into the newspapers.

The good news is that our outstanding police force is right on top of these incidents and making arrests and is to be applauded. The bad news is that with the revolving doors of overcrowded prisons and deportation of criminals to Mexico who quickly return, this will soon be a problem they won’t be able to control without increased resources.

Here’s some alarming news for those of you who think the problem has been or can be contained merely by local youth programs and more focused law enforcement. Broad based prison gangs control most of the Hispanic street gangs and drug trafficking in California. The penalty for leaving the gang is death. More than one of the above listed offenders is a parole violator. It appears that those released from jail early without adequate monitoring, and gang members sworn into the gangs with the condition of leaving the gang being their own certain death, have one thing in common: None of them are being released from jail or exiting the gang and asking “Where can I sign up for one of those youth programs that the City is offering?”

Reason? As we have noted before, gang membership is derived from a culture that cherishes lawlessness, crime, anarchy, violence, drugs, disrespect of authority, does not value life, and is romanticized by media and youth. Gang members gain status with their peers by how “bad” they are. They turn away from the gang toward more positive activities at their own peril.

Mayor Blum on her weekly radio talk show last Saturday made the claim that local crime is on a downward spiral, according to a requested report from Chief Sanchez. How these numbers were manipulated is anyone’s guess. The intended assumption to be derived must be that the almost daily weapon-wielding crimes we have seen in the last few weeks are really not happening, or not a problem. The latest gang incident was ironically reported by the Sound on the same day Marty made this claim. This self-satisfied attitude is dangerous beyond belief in light of the obvious acceleration of gang activity that we all see right before our eyes. For the Mayor, and those that portend that the gang problem has been solved by throwing a previously earmarked Federal grant at it to support youth programs, and adding some bike patrols, the above noted activity in just the last week should prove a contrary view.

A message to Mayor Blum, Chief Sanchez, City Council members: Gang membership is derived from a culture that does not respect authority, law and order, education, recreational opportunities, jobs and the fine arts, and they are not composed of those who have any interest or hope in trying to make a better life for themselves. Gangs are not composed of “youths without enough opportunities or things to do” who must be served by the community; they are comprised of criminals who choose to be criminals, will continue to choose to be criminals because of the culture that has been allowed to evolve around them, and must be dealt with accordingly!

Those leaders who understand that, and take effective action, will remain after the next election. Those who downplay this inconvenient festering crime problem as insignificant or simply an expected result of social injustice, and “kids making bad choices” (Mayor Blum) will be removed from leadership. Those who feel that the higher mission of the city is to spread the gospel of Global Warming, must be removed from the council ASAP. Turtles have had enough of this head-in-the-sand glamour seeking “leadership". One down, more to go next time. Slow and steady wins the race.

The Conservative Turtle is not an individual but a group of like-minded individuals and a forum on local issues from the conservative point of view. Here you will find previous columns, additional info, and you can leave feedback, input, questions, answers, ideas, hate mail and support. Support is most needed and appreciated to continue our quest. Comments may be added below each post or email to the link in the blog profile.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

It is not immediately clear to me what sort of action you want to see the City Council take. Perhaps in future postings you can enlighten me.

I agree with you that the Police has been quite successful in arresting and charging perpetrators of many of the crimes you list. Good for them!

It is my belief that the only way to bring the gangs down will be for the people who live here to band together against them. When ordinary residents realize that gangs threaten us all maybe they will be willing to come forward to identify perps and testify against them.

Bicycle patrols are especially effective because they put the police officers in daily contact with residents. But the police can't be everywhere. When citizens come to feel comfortable enough with the police that they can turn these gangbangers in then we will begin to see some results.

[Just to nitpick a little here -- some of your examples, like the "murder for hire gone wrong" case, took place well outside the City. They're still problems, though...]

Anonymous said...

"Gangs are not composed of “youths without enough opportunities or things to do” who must be served by the community; they are comprised of criminals who choose to be criminals, will continue to choose to be criminals because of the culture that has been allowed to evolve around them, and must be dealt with accordingly!"

I couldn't agree more ... the above statement should be laminated and placed on the desks of all members of the City Council and Board of Supervisors!

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, but I must have missed the part in this commentary about what your solutions to the gang problem are.

Maybe that was cut out for lack of space available?

Now that you outlined the recent gang related crimes, your solution to the problem would be what again?

The difference between total votes for 3 incumbents and 5 challengers is 1124 votes. That difference barely more votes than Hansen received, and less than the votes for Hansen and Cooper, who did not even run a campaign.

Turtle said...

Glad you asked about solutions, Wineguy and Wiseguy (a.k.a Must Have Missed Something).

Before solutions are discussed or presented, the first step is for the City to acknowledge that there is still a problem and to bring the City out of the delusionary world they live in where they think they have fixed it. One step at a time - slow and steady. They continue in the land of denial and attempt to make the public presentation that they have done all that they can do, the problem is getting better, and the rest is up to the community and taxpayers.

We don't want them to think they are getting away with this and fooling us, and the first part of the solution is just that- keeping the public pressure on them. We are compiling our ideas, based on what we think and what you think. And yes, you did miss something. If you read more closely and have followed our previous columns, you will see there are at least two causes being ignored - overcrowded prisons and illegal immigration. What can the City do about those? To be discussed.

This forum is exactly for that purpose - finding solutions. They need to hear from more than the turtles, we are here to inform and assist others in keeping up the pressure, as much as they might try to shake it off and pass the buck.

It is not the Turtle's responsibility to find solutions, nor is it within their power to implement solutions, though we have our opinions about what should be done and what isn't being done. First we would like to hear from the public about what they suggest, if anything. Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, it would be more helpful to offer solutions yourself than to expect them to come from us and be sarcastically critical that you aren't finding them here (yet). What we gather from your comment (Must Have Missed Something), is that you are a City leader defender, you have the same defeatist "can't-do" attitude that they do, and you also think nothing can be done. If everyone had that attitude, certainly solutions would not be found. That attitude is fine for you , but completely unacceptable for the elected officials. We will not accept that nothing can be done, or all that can be done, has.

The difference between total votes for 3 incumbents and 5 challengers is 1124 votes. That difference barely more votes than Hansen received, and less than the votes for Hansen and Cooper, who did not even run a campaign.

Must have missed your point on that one? 'Splain

Also Wineguy, thanks for noticing. We include some incidents outside the City limits, because they are just as relevant, just as potentially harmful to City residents (who are not always within City limits) and indicative of what surrounds us, and is headed our way. If you want to know what's coming - keep an eye to the South and North - Oxnard, Ventura, Lompoc, Santa Maria are all fighting the same battle. What their problem looks like today is what ours will look like tomorrow, if we don't take immediate unprecedented action.

You are right, the police can't be everywhere, which is why one part of the solution is more police. This was Dale Francisco's suggestion if you read down to our pre-election questionnaire post with him. We agree, more police are needed, and are looking forward to seeing if he delivers.